Leftists, rightists and fundamentalists | ONLINE Panorama
Staff Contact Play Us Find 5 errors Tetris Sudoku packman Snake Smashing Try memory Poker machine Pinball Pool, Draw car Super Mario Shoot the sign Blackjack tavullia Shah Solitaire Stay with News Recent Posts in RSS Actuality Argument World & Region Economy Flash Photo Gallery Photo of the Day Horoscope Chronic Last Lions Culture News Political Opinion Panorama Plus Special Galleries Sports Social 2,013 votes Typical Woman I Videos Latest Comments in RSS Follow us on Twitter Connect on Facebook
FATOS LUBONJA Yes "pry" I in a debate that drew attention because next delivery its topic I get a lot. I mean the comments sparked mot Rama on leftists and rightists in Albania, followed by a written Fevziu against him. Prime Minister, quoting Bernard Shaw-n, said that "not all right-wingers are stupid, but most fools are right" (meaning that the majority in Bangladesh finds DP). Fevziu, in an article published in "Panorama", as reminded himself once claimed that he is right, cited a saying of Eleanore Roosevelt (who mistakenly attributed the Shaw-t), according to which "the great minds deal with ideas, average minds events and small minds of people ". According Fevziu, Albanian rightists are taking the ideas, not the people, as leftists next delivery and get as did the Prime Minister himself who issued next delivery batuten - (but he did not tell us what is, according to him, Berisha, because if there Anyone who is dealing with people, is a former Prime Minister). I care because this debate helps me to argue a thesis whose long lean under which Albania has not "left" and, therefore, neither "right" - because these can not exist without each another - in terms Libertarians. But before you answer what are these aliens, let's do it on the grounds, starting with n Bernard Shaw. Of course, every statement has its own context. To understand the ç'kontekst Shaw has said that Rama quoted shall refer an allegation of a contemporary of Shaw-t, as important as that, he left, Bertrand Russell's. He says it is more or less such an idea: in this world there are two kinds of people, those who adapt to the world they live in and those seeking to adopt world by themselves / their ideas - and therefore the world belongs to those dytëve. In other words - according to Russell - is the latter that make a difference in the world. And as I understand Russell-in (by connecting with Shaw-un), these, according to them, are leftists, as generally recognized as progressive leftists and rightists as conservative. And in this division think they mind the politicians, but all thinkers on the left of the general attitude people left who, in their time, sought to change the world with tenacity. Referring to psychology and sociology, this means that we can express the Russell performing two psychosocial characteristics that human being. One is what is called "the sense of adoption", which is very important to man, because through this he survives (for better and for worse) by adapting rules and laws of society and the environment where they live. It even says that man is the being adaptable in the world. But man is also what they call "sense of possibility", which means its ability to not accept reality, to change it, to create things next delivery that do exist previously, to change the world with In a word - the only man who has and no other being in the world. Thanks to this evolution has happened sense of human society. There is no doubt that many bright people, since the time of the French Revolution onwards - when also bore the left and the right - belong to the category of progressives who have changed / transformed world. And here we should note that the opinion of Shaw Regulation regards continuity of Enlightenment modernity next delivery considered as having no little about, but also differences, next delivery with postmodernitetin to live. I say this because many delusions brought modernity in his endeavors to transform the world of the born exactly postmoderniteti next delivery response or correction of errors of modernity. Eg can not forget the champions of modernity next delivery such as the Communists came very "stupid" in their quest to change the world in relation to the conservatives, although their dream was supported by perhaps the majority of the brightest minds of the twentieth century, including Russell Shaw and un-in. So it is difficult to say who are wiser, progressives or conservatives. Personally I prefer the approach of the ancients to reality, as research to optimize its liberation, but say that, as a society, we need mençuritë both categories, which are
Staff Contact Play Us Find 5 errors Tetris Sudoku packman Snake Smashing Try memory Poker machine Pinball Pool, Draw car Super Mario Shoot the sign Blackjack tavullia Shah Solitaire Stay with News Recent Posts in RSS Actuality Argument World & Region Economy Flash Photo Gallery Photo of the Day Horoscope Chronic Last Lions Culture News Political Opinion Panorama Plus Special Galleries Sports Social 2,013 votes Typical Woman I Videos Latest Comments in RSS Follow us on Twitter Connect on Facebook
FATOS LUBONJA Yes "pry" I in a debate that drew attention because next delivery its topic I get a lot. I mean the comments sparked mot Rama on leftists and rightists in Albania, followed by a written Fevziu against him. Prime Minister, quoting Bernard Shaw-n, said that "not all right-wingers are stupid, but most fools are right" (meaning that the majority in Bangladesh finds DP). Fevziu, in an article published in "Panorama", as reminded himself once claimed that he is right, cited a saying of Eleanore Roosevelt (who mistakenly attributed the Shaw-t), according to which "the great minds deal with ideas, average minds events and small minds of people ". According Fevziu, Albanian rightists are taking the ideas, not the people, as leftists next delivery and get as did the Prime Minister himself who issued next delivery batuten - (but he did not tell us what is, according to him, Berisha, because if there Anyone who is dealing with people, is a former Prime Minister). I care because this debate helps me to argue a thesis whose long lean under which Albania has not "left" and, therefore, neither "right" - because these can not exist without each another - in terms Libertarians. But before you answer what are these aliens, let's do it on the grounds, starting with n Bernard Shaw. Of course, every statement has its own context. To understand the ç'kontekst Shaw has said that Rama quoted shall refer an allegation of a contemporary of Shaw-t, as important as that, he left, Bertrand Russell's. He says it is more or less such an idea: in this world there are two kinds of people, those who adapt to the world they live in and those seeking to adopt world by themselves / their ideas - and therefore the world belongs to those dytëve. In other words - according to Russell - is the latter that make a difference in the world. And as I understand Russell-in (by connecting with Shaw-un), these, according to them, are leftists, as generally recognized as progressive leftists and rightists as conservative. And in this division think they mind the politicians, but all thinkers on the left of the general attitude people left who, in their time, sought to change the world with tenacity. Referring to psychology and sociology, this means that we can express the Russell performing two psychosocial characteristics that human being. One is what is called "the sense of adoption", which is very important to man, because through this he survives (for better and for worse) by adapting rules and laws of society and the environment where they live. It even says that man is the being adaptable in the world. But man is also what they call "sense of possibility", which means its ability to not accept reality, to change it, to create things next delivery that do exist previously, to change the world with In a word - the only man who has and no other being in the world. Thanks to this evolution has happened sense of human society. There is no doubt that many bright people, since the time of the French Revolution onwards - when also bore the left and the right - belong to the category of progressives who have changed / transformed world. And here we should note that the opinion of Shaw Regulation regards continuity of Enlightenment modernity next delivery considered as having no little about, but also differences, next delivery with postmodernitetin to live. I say this because many delusions brought modernity in his endeavors to transform the world of the born exactly postmoderniteti next delivery response or correction of errors of modernity. Eg can not forget the champions of modernity next delivery such as the Communists came very "stupid" in their quest to change the world in relation to the conservatives, although their dream was supported by perhaps the majority of the brightest minds of the twentieth century, including Russell Shaw and un-in. So it is difficult to say who are wiser, progressives or conservatives. Personally I prefer the approach of the ancients to reality, as research to optimize its liberation, but say that, as a society, we need mençuritë both categories, which are
No comments:
Post a Comment