Friday, November 29, 2013

Because the literal application smartsend of the law, insurers can refuse payment valid civil liabi


Main navigation Home Insurance Third Party Liability Insurance of seats in vehicles Insurance Property Insurance Life Insurance Medical smartsend insurance professional liability insurance smartsend cargo insurance carrier's liability insurance crop insurance livestock insurance boat insurance accident insurance accident athletes Accident insurance Accident insurance for students to visit Hotel News FAQ About Us Contact Us Site Map Share this site:
Because the literal application smartsend of the law, insurers can refuse payment valid civil liability. For example, if the advice of his lawyer accents per car brought against the guilty driver file that can pay hundreds of thousands of dollars from his own pocket, although at the time of the accident had a valid civil liability. In this case, the insurer may refuse to pay the required smartsend amount for liability because the writ is not against it. According to Vladimir Todorov, President of the Association of policyholders and accident victims is not right person with valid third party liability to pay compensation to the victim of his own pocket. Everyone can make a mistake and that's why he bought the compulsory third party liability policy. Insurers have no problem with paying benefits for liability and that large sums, why should people trust lawyers urge them to bring an action for liability against the responsible party, but is much better for them to go to its insurer. Perhaps it would be worthwhile and:


No comments:

Post a Comment